W W P
  Wills Without Pain
  Unbiased information on all aspects of wills and probate in England and Wales
wwp

OVER TO YOU

Have you had an interesting or informative experience as an executor, beneficiary, or client of a solicitor or professional will-writer that you would like included in this site?

Do you have any questions - or want more information - regarding any item in this website?

Would you like to make any comments or corrections, or propose amendments or amplifications?

For these or any other reason, feel free to contact us.

Wills Without Pain is especially eager to hear from people who feature in a case or case study in the site or have a personal connection to someone who is mentioned.

 

Would you like to receive the WWP Newsletter by email?

Details on how to register will appear here soon.

 

 

 

 

The Tylenol Murders

This case study highlights the issues raised in Who Died First concerning survivorship.

Newlyweds Stanley and Theresa Janus cut short their honeymoon on learning of the sudden and inexplicable death of Stanley's brother, Adam, back home in Chicago, Illinois.

At a family gathering in Adam's home shortly after they arrived, Stanley and Theresa understandably felt lousy. Adam's medicine cabinet contained a bottle of Tylenol - a big-selling over-the-counter brand of pain-relief medicine - and Stanley and Theresa each swallowed a few capsules.

Soon, they too were gravely ill. It later emerged that Adam's bottle of Tylenol was one of several that had been laced with poison. Someone in the Chicago area had inserted tampered capsules into numerous bottles of the medicine and placed them to the shelves in chemist's shops.

Stanley died quickly; Theresa lingered, kept alive on a respirator. She died two days later.

Theresa clearly died after Stanley, but a lot of money was at stake depending on whether their deaths could be considered simultaneous.

If they died simultaneously, his life insurance proceeds would go to his mother, not to Theresa (or her estate).

If she died after him, the proceeds would go to her and form part of her estate on her death.

The trial and appellate courts each decided that she survived him. Her father, as her administrator, received the proceeds.

Police quickly determined the source of the poison capsules, and the manufacturer issued a massive, costly nationwide recall. The poisoner was never caught.

Janus v. Tarasewicz, 135 Ill.App.3d 936, 482 N.E.2d 418, 90 Ill.Dec. 599 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1985)

" . . . "

" . . . "

W logo  About WWP | Site Map | Contact

This website provides general information only which does not constitute advice for legal, tax, investment or other purposes. Professional advice tailored to your particular circumstances is strongly advised.

Copyright © 2008-2012 Robert Liebman. All rights reserved.